Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled
From: jon.stanton at comcast.net (Jon)
Date: Wed Nov 17 20:13:19 2004
References: <005401c4cd01$7ceceda0$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <419BE5FC.7010308@cox.net>

Isn't the F6 $300 more that the F5?



> I think the F6 may be something designed to be less expensive to produce
> while retaining pro-level functionality.  Naturally they added the
> latest electronic tweaks.  Another nice thing is that it looks like a
> little less of a monster than the F5.  Of course I'm judging from a
picture.
>
> Obviously I'm just guessing too.
>
> Mike D
>
> B. D. Colen wrote:
> > Don't worry about the gold contacts - instead ask yourself why Nikon is
> > bringing out a new F iteration that has mostly minor tweaks over the
F5;...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



Replies: Reply from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
Message from durling at cox.net (Mike Durling) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)