Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Reichmann believed the 6mp 10d rivalled 35mm. I agree if judged from prints rather than pseudo scientific bollocks. He claims the original 1Ds is close to 6x4.5 quality. I have no comment as I haven't compared prints. He uses a digital back on a Contax 645. Frank On 18 Nov, 2004, at 06:23, Feli di Giorgio wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2004, at 9:00 PM, Richard wrote: >> >> Of course there are some people of the opinions that the 1Ds and the >> new 1Ds MkII is VASTLY better than 35mm, rivalling medium format. At >> least Michael Reichmann of Luminious Landscape is quite reasonable >> about discussions, but there are others who use Michael and other >> websites as proofs that how much better 11Mp is. e.g. >> http://www.leica-camera.com/discus_e/messages/2/95118.html?1100749479 > > Didn't Reichmann also believe that the 6MP 10D was better than 35mm > and almost > as good as MF? > > I shot a 1Ds (11mp) against my Hasselblad. The Hassy won. > > > feli > > > _______________________________________________________ > feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 > www.elanphotos.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >