Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35mm normal vs. ASPH or aspherical lens
From: pklein at 2alpha.net (Peter Klein)
Date: Thu Nov 18 19:51:43 2004
References: <200411182319.iAINFaBv069916@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Just to put some pictures where our mouths are. . .

Here's the 4th Gen. 35/2 Summicron at f/2:
http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/currentpics/PaulChun03.htm

Here's the same scene with a 35/1.4 Summilux ASPH:
http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/currentpics/PaulChun00.htm

Here's another scene with the Summicron, probably at f/2.8 or f/4:
http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/currentpics/mischabutter.jpg

And another with the Summilux ASPH at f/1.7:
http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/musicians/AngieNickClaire.htm

The Summilux ASPH bokeh is indeed harsher, but the in-focus stuff is
unbelievably good wide open.  The classic Summicron is a touch soft at
f/2, but perfectly usable.  Either lens is superb at f/2.8 or smaller, but
the ASPH lens has a bit harsher bokeh.  The ASPH's harshness seems to
diminish as you stop down, but it's still there.

The 35 Summicron ASPH's "look" is very similar to the 35/1.4, just one
stop less.

--Peter

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] 35mm normal vs. ASPH or aspherical lens)