Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My experience with canon L lenses from 1996 to date has been very very good. Each lens has been in for a CLA each twice in that time. These lenses get used on a daily professional basis and overall I would rate their reliabilty very good, despite having a mix of materials. The lenses, I have used which all have been very good are: 70~200 f2.8 L 20~35 f2.8 L 16~35 f2.8 L 300mm f2.8 L 400mm f2.8 L 50mm f1.4 55mm f2.5 Macro All above are non stabilized type. Canon Eos lenses that I have used and not cared for: 50mm f1.8 (first series, it died and Canon claims not to offer repairs for it, it was a great lens, but only if stopped down to f2 or below.) 28~105 f4-f5.6, nice lens but wide open a touch soft IMHO. Cheap feeling to it. Just to make you also aware, my Leica M lenses build quality is a quantum notch above these Canon lenses, but when you look at the cost benefit ratio, the Canon stuff is pretty decent. I will admit the 300mm f2.8 L lens is just the best 300mm f2.8 I have EVER EVER used. gck