Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2
From: lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda)
Date: Sun Dec 5 12:42:34 2004
References: <200412051050.iB5Am3BV033539@server1.waverley.reid.org> <002b01c4dad8$5867df50$a752d553@mendigain> <02A06116-46F4-11D9-9B6B-003065B7587A@interlink.es> <056D8A01-46F6-11D9-AD63-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>
On 5 de dic de 2004, at 20:44, John Collier wrote:
> Sure, underwater.
underwater is nearly unbeatable, but isnt as bad as you think on land,
at least I will prefer it before the other nikkors for F-mount I've
tried.
Obviously it cant stand with a modern asph well designed one. I was
trying to say that Nikkor-F 28s arent so good.
Saludos, lmc@imaginarymagnitude.net
lmc@interlink.es
________________________________________________
"When Government fears the people, it's liberty.
When people fear the Government, it's tyranny."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Replies:
Reply from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs. Voigtländer 2)
In reply to:
Message from fmaturana at euskalnet.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)