[Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG

Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG
From: robinsnes at comcast.net (Roger Skully)
Date: Sun Dec 12 06:42:47 2004

I am looking for a new printer .Currently am using an Epson 960... A 6 ink
dye printer. I have heard and read a great deal about the Epson pigment
printers, the Epson 2200 and the Epson R800. The R800 received rave reviews
in the latest Mac World. I stopped at Ritz and the sales manager was gung-ho
about the Canon i9900. I really do not need images larger than 8x10.
Longevity past 75-100 years is not a concern, I hope;-)  Ink fade is if it
happens quickly (5 to 10 years). I work off a Mac powerbook G4 running
OSX10.3.6 if drivers are a concern. Anyone have experience with any of these
beasties?
Thanks
Roger Skully

Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Reply from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Reply from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Printer experiences of the LUG)
Reply from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Reply from rickfloyd at comcast.net (Richard C. Floyd) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Reply from rzartarian at snet.net (Roy Zartarian) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] The only Leica I ever sold -- survey time)