Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Correct. The Zeiss 40/2.8 appears to be LTM according to the description. On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:48:24 -0500, Craig Zeni <sdp35@cwazy.co.uk> wrote: > Interesting...Adorama has them for that price...upon perusing the page > ( http://www.adorama.com/RL4028RF.html) I note that it's "Leica M > mount and screw mount compatiable" > > :) > > CZ > NC > > On Dec 25, 2004, at 8:29 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > > > Or that ill-advised Rollei RF? Since nobody is buying them, they are > > down to $599 for the body and about $550 for the 40/2.8 Sonnar lens. > > > > Jeffery > > > > > > On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 15:19:21 -0800, Frank Filippone > > <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote: > >> Have you tried a CL/CLE? I bet that would work just fine...... > >> > >> Frank Filippone > >> red735i@earthlink.net > >> > >> > >> See, if Kobayashi had made the 40/1.4 in LTM only, WE > >> could choose whether to put on a 35mm or a 50mm M > >> adapter for use on our M cameras. > >> > >> As it is, this neat M mount-only lens brings up the > >> 50mm frame, far from ideal. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >