Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I suspect, Rei, that we actually agree on a great deal - but most of our exchanges centers on those things on which we tend to disagree. :-) B. D. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Rei Shinozuka Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:23 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions wow, do we agree on something? :-) -rei On Mar29 16:14, B. D. Colen wrote: > Oh blah, blah blah, Buzz -;-) An APO it ain't, but it also ain't no > pooch. Heavy, yes, but it makes using a 135 on an M practical with > those eyes. And soft? Compared to an APO? Yup. But it's more than good > enough for gummint work. In fact, I'd say it's one of the real bargins > in Leica lensdom, given that it can be picked up for under $500. > > B. D. > A contrarian to the end. :-) -- Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com Ridgewood, New Jersey _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information