Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:19:05 2004

ditto for me: It does not see enough use to warrant an  upgrade, and 
the results are always "stunning".

On Tuesday, Mar 30, 2004, at 12:18 Australia/Melbourne, Feli di Giorgio 
wrote:

> The 135/4 Tele-Elmar is one heck of a bargain. I picked up a very 
> clean example
> for about $350.
>
> I shot a good deal of Kodachrome64 with mine and this is one blazing 
> sharp
> lens. Projected slides are razor sharp and have that "sparkle" we 
> associate
> with Leica glass.
>
>
> Feli


Alastair



In reply to: Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)