Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] in search of a portrait f2 90
From: abridge at dcn.org (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:19:56 2004

On 4/16/04 <bdcolen@earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)> thoughtfully wrote: 

>Yup - If for some bizarre reason you really want to do your portrait
>shooting with a rangefinder rather than a reflex, go with the 90
>Summicron - It's plenty sharp and contrasty, but not overwhelmingly
>either, which makes it an excellent portrait lens. I briefly owned the
>90 APO, and I sold it and went back to the old war horse - and haven't
>regreted it for a moment.

Bizarre? Well for me it has become the ONLY camera I use for portraiture. 
It's
small, doesn't intimidate either the subject or me, and since everything I 
shoot
qualifies as "environmental" in that I don't use lights or a studio the
excellent wide-open glass works well for me. And seeing beyond the frame 
lines
helps me remember to change my position.

Sometimes I lose shoots because I move and forget to focus. I do that less 
and
less.

Thanks for the datapoint, however bizarre my choices.

Adam



Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] in search of a portrait f2 90)
Reply from daniel_ridings at yahoo.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] in search of a portrait f2 90)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] in search of a portrait f2 90)