Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] non-leica macro fun with flowers
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:20:23 2004
References: <BCB2FB72.F89C%yup@pacbell.net> <000d01c42bfe$1b890a70$87d86c18@ted>


| doug kim showed and said:
| Subject: [Leica] non-leica macro fun with flowers
|
| > i'm not a flowers kind of guy but had to rent a nikon D1X and a
110mm
| macro
| > for this gig. what fun!!!
| >
| > http://www.ricecracker.net/descanso/
| >
| > all comments welcome and i promise to post some leica stuff
next!<<<<<<<<
|
| Hi Doug,
| One of the toughest shoots anyone can have who isn't a regular macro
flower
| shooter is just what you've done.
|
| Some of yours are very well done, others mediocre. No offence
intended, as
| you are not alone in shooting this and doing it not absolutely
perfect, even
| though the majority look very cool.  Been there done it and I swear in
the
| view finder screen, everyone I shot was a million dollar flower shot.
:-)
|
| We get a macro and we're inside the flowers and the colours are
beautiful
| and we get absolutely suckered by the colours, forms, shapes
iridescence and
| what's on the view finder screen as a " drop dead gorgeous" shot
because we
| don't shoot this stuff every day> Nor do we normally look at the world
in
| this fashion every day.
|
| Therefore we tend to shoot things that look cool, well we think
they're
| cool, when in real-time they're merely colour exposures of interesting
| looking things that have no meaning to them compositionally nor
design. Some
| do of course, however for every great one there are ten so-so .
|
| OK they sort of look great, but it's being in focus at not quite the
right
| point in-relation to the main point of colour design or some other
minor
| failing. That when you really take the time to study each one you get
real
| hard nosed to what works and what doesn't..
|
| But like I said some are smashingly good. Others, it's like, "So?" And
it's
| a tough call to sort them out because in this kind of photography it's
in
| the eye of the beholder that sorts out the magical ones from the not
so
| magical ones.
|
| for what it's worth.
|
| ted
|
Hello Doug,

I dont know much about macro but think you should bin
this one
http://www.ricecracker.net/descanso/pages/DSC_0181.htm
Why include it?
best regards
simon jessurun
amsterdam



In reply to: Message from yup at pacbell.net (doug kim) ([Leica] non-leica macro fun with flowers)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] non-leica macro fun with flowers)