Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:20:51 2004
 
Great camera, Mark - Slower speed motor, and you can't hammer nails with
it. But it will take a normal beating, it's MUCH better than the N80,
and as Feli notes, has essential the same features, is smaller, lighter,
and much less expensive than the F5.

B. D.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Feli di Giorgio
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 7:27 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.



> I'd kill for an F5. Getting by with an N80 it takes a lickin and keeps

> on clickin. And is borderline disposable. Mark Rabiner
> Photography
> Portland Oregon

How about a F100? Same features, smaller and cheaper. I think Nikon is
offering a healthy promotional rebate on them right now.


Feli

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from feli at creocollective.com (Feli) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)
 In reply to: Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)