Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:20:51 2004

It's sure ruined allot of great shots for me! ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Feli
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 7:49 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.



On May 6, 2004, at 4:32 PM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> Great camera, Mark - Slower speed motor, and you can't hammer nails
> with
> it. But it will take a normal beating, it's MUCH better than the N80,
> and as Feli notes, has essential the same features, is smaller, 
> lighter,
> and much less expensive than the F5.
>
> B. D.
>

The biggest drawback is you have to shoot with that fuzzy Nikon glass.
;-)


Feli

________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from feli at creocollective.com (Feli) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)
In reply to: Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)