Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 27, Issue 170
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:20:56 2004

One of the great Nikon "secrets" is that the older lenses, not marked
ED, were in fact ED lenses.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Felix Lopez de Maturana
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 4:33 PM
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 27, Issue 170


> See the smiley Felix? It's a joke. There is a lot of good Nikon glass.

> I think on average the Leica glass is better, but it also costs a hell

> of a lot more. I have always been a fan of Nikon bodies and I have 
> actually been thinking about getting a F2 or F3 because I need a good,

> fast lightweight 180. Any suggestions?
>
> Feli

Thanks Feli, I need revamping my humor sense, irony and kidding
strategy! The 180mm f2.8 AIS is an excellent lens very compact and very
sharp. With a Nikon F3 is a light, comfortable and effective combo. New
lenses have ED but I believe old ones were too extreme dispersion
glass.Today this combo is secon hand or E*** really cheap.

Regards

Felix


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from fmaturana at euskalnet.net (Felix Lopez de Maturana) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 27, Issue 170)