Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Who Still Has a Darkroom?
From: helme at home.nl (Arne Helme)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:21:21 2004
References: <200405122311.i4CNB8JS079495@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Marc,

I still have a darkroom and I have recently started to use it again!  Just 
like
you I dedicated a room in the attick for use as a darkroom when we rebuilt 
our
house a couple of years ago.  However, the role of parenthood took priority
about a year ago and pushed photography significantly down on the priority
list.

As I said, I recently started to use the darkroom again.  The reason simply
being that I for several reasons prefer the analog process to the digital one
for my photgraphic hobby.  Being a computer specialist I have spent my share 
of
hours in front of the computer screen the last 20 years so I do not have the
urge to spend even more hours in front of the computer than what is strictly
necessary to do my daily job.

Sure, I do scan my films too and it is cool what can be done with a sharp
transparencies made using the best M&R lenses, a good scanner, Vuescan,
NeatImage, and Digital Light & Color's Picture Windows (which in my opinion 
is
superior to Photoshop for photographic purposes).  For color this setup is 
now
my preferred way of processing photos and I do not shoot any color negative
films anymore.  The result is is quite good!

For B&W, though, I started to use the darkroom again.  Being an amateur
photographer I do not have to make very many copies of each print so I can
afford to spend the time required in the darkroom to process each print.  I
usually enlarge them to 11"x15".  For me, therefore, the analog process is
faster than processing scanned images of the same photos on my computer, and
much more fun :-)! 

I can understand that those of you who need to create lots and lots of copies
digital is the way to go, no doubt about it!  Then it is worthwhile to spend 
an
extra effort on creating a high quality digital image that easily and
predictably can be printed with good results again and again (independent of
whether the source image was created by a digital camera or scanned from a
negative).

Still each digital print that I make is a reproduction while each of the 
analog
prints that I make in the darkroom is an original that has a certain 
uniqueness
to it.  It is no doubt about which version I prefer to give away to others.

IMHO.

-- 
Arne Helme
HELME CONSULTING
Email: helme at home.nl (^" at "^@)
Phone: +31534309352 (office), +31642697956 (mobile)


-----Original Message-----
From: Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net>
To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
Subject: [Leica] Who Still Has a Darkroom?
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 17:41:18 -0400

I moved into my present house almost two years ago, and dedicated a room in
the attic for use as a darkroom (it had originally been the  Servants
Quarters' when this house was built in 1897).  I have never completed
fixing it up as such, as I now scan my negatives and slides and, now that I
am getting a bit familiar with this, I have no strong desire to go back to
chemical work.  I can load film into tanks in a changing bag and processing
is no big thing.  

But I am unwilling to give up, quite yet, on the ability to produce
chemical prints as they still are better in quality than are scans, at
least with my current gear and at my current level of expertise.   I
suspect I will never finish making the putative darkroom completely
light-tight and air-conditioned but, still, I cannot quite give up on it.
I have a grand set of gear (a Leica V35 and a Beseler 23CX-II with
Rodenstock APO enlarging lenses, all sorts of trays, tongs, timers, lights,
&c &c) -- Hell, I not only have 16mm and 127 reels but I have not one but
TWO print driers.  And finishing the darkroom would be a matter of five or
six hours or less.

Dreams die hard.  I spent a magnificent number of hours over forty years in
a darkroom and I guess it is time to admit that I'll probably never enlarge
another negative.  But I'm not willing, yet, to come to terms with this
reality.

So, like Tina, I can and do process film but scanning is becoming just so
damned EASY!

Marc

msmall@infionline.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!