Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] re: older or newer Summitar
From: aaron.sandler at duke.edu (Aaron Sandler)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:22:02 2004
References: <1d2.21eb5f5a.2de50e9b@aol.com> <1d2.21eb5f5a.2de50e9b@aol.com>

My later Summitar (the one that started this whole mess) has # 754xxx, with 
many flat aperture blades (looks like 10) making a very round hole.  The 
quality of the bokeh sometimes seems very nice, sometimes less so.  Of 
course, I don't generally take notes or do tests, so it may be that some 
apertures look nicer than others.

I suppose it might be worth me taking notes for a couple of rolls to figure 
out what apertures produce the nicer bokeh.   Has anyone else done such 
tests on their Summitar?

-Aaron

>Thanks to "Thinkof Cole" and also to Michiel Fokkema for your trouble.
>
>My Summitar has a serial No 721xxx  which I believe is still quite early 
>1948? . When I get it back I will look to see if the iris blades are flat 
>or curved and then try it !!!!
>
>Regards Claude Hayward


>Thinkofcole@aol.com wrote:
>
>>Lager says early Summitars have flat diaphram blades that form a circular 
>>aperture while later Summitars have domed [forward curving] blades that 
>>form a hexagonal opening. He adds that Summitars after Nov. 1945 [@ 
>>#587601] are factory coated and from early 1946 [about #611000] have 
>>international apertures to f16.-- bob cole



In reply to: Message from Thinkofcole at aol.com (Thinkofcole@aol.com) ([Leica] re: older or newer Summitar)
Message from claude.hayward at btinternet.com (Claude Hayward) ([Leica] re: older or newer Summitar)