Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 5/28/04 <bdcolen@earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)> thoughtfully wrote: > >But why? Let me see: because this is above all, a list of people who are >supposedly interested in things photographic; because the presentation >relates to the role of photography in the modern world; because the >presentation relates to how the uses of photography may or may not >reflect our social values; because it's interesting to read varying >viewpoints on issues on public importance. > The photos are very troubling - in much the same way as "reality television" is very troubling to me. Clearly a process was at work in Iraq, and Afghanistan and possibly in Getmo although I don't know it, in which prison guards were given extraordinary power over those in their care and then made to feel good about acts of what, to me and most people I know, amount to torture. And they were made to feel that what they were doing was so normal that it was just fine to take snapshots for the folks back home. And it's that cheapening of empathy that truly is at the heart of what troubles me the most. I would suggest that, in the United States that cheapening is purvasive in the mass media. It's what I was writing about when I was talking about Janet Jackson's Super Bowl stunt. It's good that people can easily document what is going on around them. It's awful when they do horrific things and don't see them as horrific. I've talked to many survivors of WW II and Vietnam who have awful memories of those events. None of these were things they would have taken snap shots of for the folks back home. There's a cynical and cruel streak within American culture that I find disgusting. It fills the media and it's a part of the local teen and college culture -- even though those displaying the behavior would deny it was any such thing. And it's a part of what passes for political discourse - the vicious "take no prisoners" approach in which winning is the only thing, that winning is "best for the country." I know of no professional military men who feel anything other than revulsion at the prison photos. Not because they were released but because of the clear lack of honor and empathy they represent. It's not that they want them hidden - they want them never to have existed in the first place - that the actions were wrong and the command structure damaged so badly that they could be allowed. I heard Al Gore this morning demanding that at least six administration figures should resign for what is happening. He's right. At at least that many in the military chain of command should do the same. It's shameful that the lowest in the chain of command - those who were encouaged - should be left as scapegoat while those who commanded and should have been over-seeing escape. I'm angry about this. Hurt that we could undermine our soldiers by freely allowing them to explore their baser instincts on those in our custody and care. And I think the problem is cultural and that we will not see it that way. Adam Bridge