Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Here's a camera reality check -
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:22:56 2004
 
The apartment my daughter and two roommates share was broken into a
couple days ago. The kids came how to find things torn apart, but things
which the thief was obviously initially attracted to laid out neatly on
their beds. My daughter's Olympus Stylus and Sekonic 308 light meter
were both missing. But lying on her bed were a Rollei 3.5, a
cosmetically beautiful 2.8f, and a cosmetically perfect Rollei GX! After
all, who'd pay for those goofy old box cameras? :-)



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Aaron Sandler
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 3:22 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: RE: [Leica] New York, New York


Actually, Jim & Buzz, the correct answer is that it's both.  :)

Buzz suspected:
>Neither, it's a "Skinny."

after Jim Shulman asked:
>Is it a collapsible 90, or rigid?

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Here's a camera reality check -)
Reply from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Here's a camera reality check -)
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Here's a camera reality check -)
 In reply to: Message from aaron.sandler at duke.edu (Aaron Sandler) ([Leica] New York, New York)