Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fungus in camera
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:23:30 2004
References: <BD09709A.69E2%s.dimitrov@charter.net>

I'm sorry but I literally don't understand what you're driving at here
and I'd like to at least have a clue.

Could you expand or interpret?

Adam

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:41:14 -0700, Slobodan Dimitrov
<s.dimitrov@charter.net> wrote:
> 
> Those prissy Germans.
> So, what's the problem?  Subcontract the work on the camera to a third 
> world
> country, like Viet Nam, or Malaysia. They can be right next door to a chip
> or sneaker factory, and with an ISO9100 rating, and no one would be the
> wiser.
> Sounds to me like they just want to sell more cameras. Wait a minute, am I
> detecting a sea change at Solms?
> S. Dimitrov
> 
> > From: Dan C <bladman99@yahoo.ca>
> 
> 
> 
> > I finally received my 4/2004 issue of Leica Fotographie International
> > (LFI).   Two interesting articles in it, the first dealing with repairing
> > Leica M cameras.  Apparently the worst thing that can happen to a camera 
> > or
> > lens is having it become infected with fungus.  Leica Solms will not 
> > repair
> > such a camera.   The chemical required are "illegal" and, they state, the
> > fungus itself is hazardous to people's health.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Fungus in camera)
In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Fungus in camera)