Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Analog v. Digital
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:24:00 2004
 
Unfortunately true. ;-) 


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
David Mason
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:51 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Analog v. Digital


On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:47:06 -0400, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> But someone, at some point, decided that "electronic" was pass? and 
> oh-so-50s, and that "digital" was a more marketable term, and, 
> besides, it was one people could come to understand in terms of 
> watches and clocks - digital is modern and up-to-date, analogue is 
> old-fashioned and stodgy.
> 
> JustMHO.... :-)


Oh B.D., you're just a stodgy old man! :)

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Analog v. Digital)