Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]:-) -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of buzz.hausner@verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:35 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: the first IIIg At least with Leicas, fake or real, as opposed to Lugers, fake or real, the victim rarely finds the shot fatal. Buzz Hausner > > From: Walker Smith <doubs43@cox.net> > Date: 2004/08/17 Tue PM 12:57:22 EDT > To: lug@leica-users.org > Subject: [Leica] Re: the first IIIg > > Fakes are a problem in every area of collecting when the value makes > it > profitable for crooks (read that as SCUM) to replicate an original. > Having been in the Luger (German military and civilian handgun) > collecting arena over a period of years I can say with certainty that > it's likely the most faked collectable item ever made. With the values > of these old guns often equal to, or greater than, the cost of a new > Leica camera body or Noctilux lens, the temptation to deceive is too > much for some people. It's an area that requires the accumulation of > vast knowledge before trying to accumulate the articles or you'll end up > being skinned. > > When I originally posted to this thread last night, the first question > in my mind was: "Why wouldn't the factory keep the first serial number > of any new model for it's historical value?" I'm pleased to see that > seems to be the case which makes the IIIg in question an undoubted fake. > > Just look at the large number of fake Leicas coming out of the former > USSR countries. Judging from the photographs, some of the fakers have > genuine craftsman skills that could be put to better use. > > Walker _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information