Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: doll toss semi finals
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Sun Apr 3 12:07:53 2005
References: <p4c051lm9775dpi6qkfd11q7nrf49alge1@4ax.com> <002101c5387c$a43abc20$1ae76c18@ted> <i2f051dcsnd9j3re41crcbc9mtrp0t0m0h@4ax.com>

Well OK eh? ;-) Much better, you might even trim a little off the right side 
also.

But now you have an interesting picture as her attention is completely to 
the right point without the distracting boy.

It was like was a kind of tag on and not really involved with the young 
lady's activity.

ted
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:58 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re: doll toss semi finals


> Ted:
>
>>> > http://canid.com/current/kirby_science_discovery_center_vortex.html<
>
>>Second shot isn't a winner either due to the bad light/shadow on the boy's
>>face! Pity! You can almost crop him out completely and have a sort of
>>interesting shot with the little girl only due to her direct eye line to 
>>her
>>hand.
>>
>>I'm surprised you didn't pick-up on the face shadow as it's so obvious and
>>hardly something one would miss.
>
> Boy?  What boy?  :)  (Hit reload on your browser.)
>
> I wasn't sure if it was too distracting or not.  Guess it was.  Do you 
> like
> this version better?
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look and comment, Ted!
>
> --
> Eric
> http://canid.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] doll toss semi finals)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] doll toss semi finals)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: doll toss semi finals)