Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Wed Apr 20 23:29:29 2005
References: <426702D0.1080605@comcast.net> <d03e5ecb9317cfc1fa24824fa09e857a@shaw.ca> <20050421032058.25925.qmail@balhpl01.ncable.net.au> <7eaa9f12a6977062cb6e83405885c0cd@earthlink.net>

Prices for B&W film are already going up. Part of the fun of shooting
B&W is shooting a ton of film and souping it myself as an overall economical
activity.

Well, gray market Tri-X dried up this summer, so I bought 1/2 a freezer full
of HP5+ and FP4+.  Thankfully HP5+ really likes HC-110, so it wasn't too
much of a switch. Scan's a little grainier than Tri-X, but I've come to 
appreciate
it's tones. I'm still trying got get FP4+ contrast in line with what my 
film scanner
wants to see, but when it's on, boy that is one *fantastic* film.

Anyway, Ilford's film prices at B&H are up now too!  Fuji Neopan 400
is still available "imported" for something like $2.29 a roll, so I'm 
tempted
to go buy and freeze 100 rolls of that stuff. The Arista repacked HP5
is also a little cheaper if you buy in bulk.

Anyway, when I shoot B&W, it just don't even think about film costs,
and I like it that way. I also like the results. I can scan and print 
digitally,
or walk down to a nice lab and have a wet print made. I like having the
negs in folders and not images sitting on hard disks or what not. It just
works for me.  I hope I can get over the hurdle of $5/roll if it comes to
that.

Scott

Feli wrote:

> I think color negative film will be the first to bite the dust. It's 
> too dependent on the average consumer, who is
> going digital. It's also become expensive, nearly $15 per roll 
> (purchase and develop).
>
> Slide film may hang on longer, because there is no means of digital 
> projection this side of $100,000 that is even in the ballpark with it.
>
> Black and white will probably survive for a very long time. It's 
> simpler to manufacture than color films, easier to process (at home 
> and at the lab) and it's already a niche product. I would bet that 
> most people who continue to shoot will film, will be black and white 
> shooters. They shoot film because they like to. But I do think prices 
> will go up and the selection will narrow...
>
> Give me Tri-X or give me death.
>
> feli
>
> On Apr 20, 2005, at 8:20 PM, firkin wrote:
>
>> 6 months ago, I would have argued with you along the lines of "film 
>> will be with us for a long time yet" and "there will be many hobbists 
>> who will enjoy the feel and real of Leica photography", BUT I am 
>> beginnin...
>
> ________________________________________________________
> feli2@earthlink.net                 2 + 2 = 4               
> www.elanphotos.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....)
Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Re: Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....)
In reply to: Message from rclark01 at comcast.net (Robert Clark) ([Leica] Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....)
Message from firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Re: Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Re: Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....)