Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Peter, I think Douglass was right when he said it needs nearer 1.5 degrees of anticlockwise rotation to bring it into line. If you open up the full-size image and move your window around so that the top or bottom edge of the window is touching the top of the flat part of St Pauls below the dome you'll see what I mean. You can't use the bridge to align the picture because the bridge is designed to be flexible and so isn't always parallel to the surroundings! :-) Simon. On 5/17/05, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig@summaventures.com> wrote: > Douglas Sharp wrote: > > An excellent shot Peter, > > love the symmetry! > > but couldn't it take a slight correction of the horizontal? > > I think its about 1 or 1.5 degrees out of kilter. Otherwise perfect for > > me. > > cheers > > Douglas > > > > Douglas and List, > > see which one you you think is straight... > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album164/MilleniumBridge200505 > > the original > > or: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album164/MilleniumBridge200505Rot1 > > I think that it is it straightened...it took 0.4 degrees of rotation. If > that > does truly fix it (I am not entirely sure) Douglas you have very sharp > eyes!! > > All the best, > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >