Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The story about not printing "professional" images just means that Wal-Mart is still stinging from a few lawsuits about copying professional images. It seems a few enterprising studios registered some images, then toddled over to a few Wal-Marts and made quite a few copies. Receipt in hand the next stop was the friendly solicitor. As good Luggites you will know that it didn't take much legal muscle to win a few million dollars in the legal lottery. I would assume that the corporate office sent a few vaguely worded but very specific memo's out. Probably on the lines of, if you copy an image that is protected you and your little dog will be toast. With the law pretty vague on what a photographer has to do to mark a protected image the only safe route for a deep pocket is to decline to reproduce images that are questionable. Don dorysrus@mindspring.com