Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Voigtlander 40/1.4 (was Leica prices)
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Fri Jun 10 07:13:53 2005
References: <ff.153d4e32.2fda775c@aol.com>

That's been my experience also. Nice, but not good enough. Even older  
Leica lenses with their obvious technological period problems have a  
better signature.


Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8, AGCC
http://sdimitrovphoto.com



On Jun 9, 2005, at 9:55 PM, Grduprey@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 6/9/2005 4:42:20 PM Central Daylight Time,
> luisripoll@telefonica.net writes:
> Thanks for your opinion Gene, I thaught that Nokton was better...
> I guess I must be the only LUGer that does not like his/her CV  
> optic.  The
> mechanicals are very nice, but the optics are not what I expected.
>
> Gene
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter) ([Leica] Re: Voigtlander 40/1.4 (was Leica prices))
In reply to: Message from Grduprey at aol.com (Grduprey@aol.com) ([Leica] Re: Voigtlander 40/1.4 (was Leica prices))