Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As a long time Minolta and Leica user I agree wholeheartedly with this clearly well-balanced appraisal. -dan c. At 01:41 PM 11-06-05 -0700, Martin Krieger wrote: >This is from the cvug group: > >Since I test cameras and lenses for photo magazines I have probably >> used more different cameras and lenses than most. Generally, in >> comparing SLR lenses, I have found that Leica and Zeiss are at the >> top in most cases. Particularly this is true of their newer designs. >> The difference is that Leica go to obsessive lengths in assembly of >> lenses to center elements precisely and adjust everything to very >> tight tolerances. Zeiss is much less obsessive about this stuff, and >> the Japanese manufacturers don't do any specific centering except >> possibly in very expensive lenses. When comparing Nikon and Canon, I >> have found that Nikon makes marginally better wide angle lenses and >> Canon makes better long telephotos. Minolta is as good as either of >> them, and beats both handily in many lenses. Pentax is a close third, >> with a handful of really outstanding optics. Olympus used to come in >> dead last, with some real coke bottles, but I hear their new 4/3 glass >> is really good. I haven't used any of it myself. > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >