Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is true that technique and technology have a role to play, but in the hands of someone who really doesn't know what he is doing, they are of little help in creating a distinguished photo. The transforming moment for me in realizing this was several years ago when I was at the PhotoHistory conference at Eastman House in Rochester NY. There was an exhibition of Magnum photographs -- all of them of interest. But the photos that were the most striking were the early ones. Technically, they couldn't hold a candle to the work of the later Magnum photographers, but the earlier photographers had a knack, not only for capturing the "decisive moment" but for composition. Although often technically deficient (blurry, grainy, poorly exposed) they were knockouts. Talent for image making is more important than the equipment used. This isn't to say that there would be no difference in HCB's work if he had more modern Leica lenses, or that Steiglitz's work wouldn't benefit by the latest in large format cameras and lenses. It simply means that the best equipment won't make you a Steiglitz or a HCB. This isn't my ego talking -- I don't consider myself to be much more than a competent snapshot taker. Mark