Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I could hardly follow this article. Bigger lenses? That's not what Oly is claiming about their 4/3 sensor - right? Is he talking about sensor/negative format, or something particular to digital sensors? If so, the evidence provided in the article is somewhat shy compared to many of his other articles. Many folks prefer the performance of certain 135 format lenses on APS-C sensors. The Nikkor 35/2 AFD comes to mind for example. Is Puts talking about some theoretical truth to which material reality to which material reality has not yet caught up? I just couldn't quite follow this particular article, which rambled on and on, and contradicted alot of "received wisdom" I've read to date. What am I missing? Scott animal wrote: >http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c014.html > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >