Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?
From: tgif at mbi.nifty.com (Tom Kumagai)
Date: Sat Jun 25 05:05:36 2005
References: <001401c578c0$e7588800$5540e344@newukolbqveo9i> <42BC4006.8090301@adrenaline.com>
 
Scott

I know it is not an RF, but how would you like an (almost IIIf size) 
Olympus OM1 with a compact zoom 28-48mm F4.
Ah, the lens aint collapse... The designer was a Leica user too (until 
Mr.Maitani designed the cameras [either Pen or OM]
according to his book).

Tom.

Scott McLoughlin wrote:

> Right on. Let's get small :-)
>
> Bessa R is light, but still too large, IMHO. How about a small 
> interchangable
> lens RF?  Or how about an approx Leica III sized fixed lens RF 
> outfitted with
> a mini (collapsible into body) 28-50 or 35-75?
> Scott
>
> Jeffery Smith wrote:
Replies: Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)
 In reply to: Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)