Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: where oh where is the DMR?
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Wed Jun 29 15:47:51 2005
References: <200506292201.j5TLvwTn057924@server1.waverley.reid.org> <42C3216F.60803@telefonica.net>

I hated the non-FF issue at first. But then my 80-200/2.8 Nikon became a
300/2.8 which has saved my Arse many times at ceremonies.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "F?lix L?pez de Maturana" Subject: [Leica] Re: where oh where is the
DMR?


> This is the typical reasoning of every *non full frame* user. I shoot
> regularly with Canon and Nikon cameras. (With Leica too, to be  on
> topic). I use full frame and the so called APS sensor cameras and I know
> the clear superiority of full frame sensor not theoretically but in real
> world. Just my opinion: if Leica has no full frame sensor cameras in the
> future I'll not be interested in Leica digital. I had in my hands a DMR
> but I've not shot extensively for having clear ideas about it. Just I'll
> wait.
>
> Felix
> "El que calla, otorga..."



In reply to: Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re: where oh where is the DMR?)