Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 7/13/05 9:14:12 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org writes: > I take my cameras out and I make PHOTOGRAPHS, the camera i use, LEICA, > makes > me THINK about the photographs before I take them. I compose them in my > mind, and capture them on film, and then I develop this film and PRINT it > in > my DARKROOM. Today's kids brains have been destroyed by auto-idiot cameras > and they don't understand anything. Which is why their "photographs" are so > bad. The so called "digital" is not photography. PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE > CREATION > OF AN IMAGE ON FILM. My Leica cameras will last for another one-hundred > years, and if I am not around to use them, then my grandchildren will use > them and they will be just as capable as producing PHOTOGRAPHS then as they > are now. > > I'm glad many of you have been waiting for someone to say this. > > George > > -------------------------------------- George, Don't despair. We're going through a shakeout period in photography. The tree is developing another branch, but the trunk and roots are intact, which is traditional technology. I've been doing some chinning on the new branch with a Nikon D70 and an Oly 5050. Digital has its uses for swift distribution and feedback, but it is not permanent, has no negative for credibility, and the image is smoothed out by circuitry so there's no analogue tooth to it. Also cataloging digital images is very difficult because it has no center: no negative we can go back to for the record. I've given up trying to integrate my negative files with my digital files; so I'm keeping them separate. I'll avoid climbing too far out on the digital limb, however attractive it may be. It's a long fall to the ground. Bob R