Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dear Colleagues, Brett Weston had to destroy his negatives to maintain the value of his prints. It was the only way he could assure the buyer of the one of a kind value of his acquisition. That says something about the significance of negatives. Their permanence. Their ability to regenerate fresh prints. Their incontrovertible reference for the original scene. Their physicality. What I find odd in our thinking is the notion that film is limited and labor and time intensive. Therefore, we should consign film to obsolescence. Yet we could all return to our film Nikons and still practice digital photography without missing a beat. Long before I bought my first digital I scanned my favorite film prints as they came from the processor and made them into image files. And I still have their negatives. Sometimes I think a sensor is just another type of film. Bob