Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard, LUGers do not have higher standards than any other list I've run across, there are some photographers here that top the list over the most interesting to follow, but they are few when compared to the subscription list of LUGers (there's a lot of them). The important thing is to continue with keeping your deadlines, even if you don't "publish". And the point about dead-lines ... it just keeps you out there taking pictures, and that's why we have cameras. Post anyway. I don't announce every week anymore either. It's frustrating to rarely get feed-back, I know. Still, that's not why I take pictures, so I just keep plodding along. Do that too. You'll be a better photographer for it. Daniel Ridings http://www.dlridings.com/paw2005 On 8/24/05, Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote: > ... > So while I will continue to do the PAW, I will not be announcing them every > week, unless I think they have some merits. The only reason I felt compel > to write about it is just to say that I am not quitting. I will do this PAW > and more every week. And of course a lot of time I thought certain pictures > have some merits, but they are often "not good enough" or worse. Clearly > luggers have high standard, and of course we have high standard bearers too > who amaze us with their shots weekly and in some cases, daily. For these > people, I thank you. It's always inspiring to see a GB pic, a Steve Barbour > pic., a Doug Herr pic etc. Keep them coming please. > > // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please > use richard at imagecraft.com) > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >