Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]True, "more punch in the blacks" is a bit cryptic: blacker doesn't exist. :-) I'll rephrase: play a bit with contrast, then add a semi transparent (% to be determined) layer of a warm gray, and it'll look like your blacks are denser. Or said differently: try to extend the dynamic range without the dark tones getting dull. > From: Adam Bridge <abridge@gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:13:20 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] My barber > > Thank everyone for their feedback - I greatly appreciate it. > > Phillippe - can you explain a little about what you mean by "more > punch in the blacks"? I'm not sure what you mean and I'd like to > understand. > > Don - thank you for pointing out that I surely could have shifted to > 400 and gotten a better image. I realize that I had made up my mind > from an initial estimate and then I didn't verify that this was the > case. > > Robert - I'm not so sure that pushed two stops Tri-X would have been > better, at least not in my hands. I like the look of Tri-X - but my > experience and doing my own chemstry makes me feel that it would not > have worked as well. > > However, as Don pointed out, using my 50 Summicron at f2.8 would have > given a very nice result as well. > > I do appreciate the feedback from everyone and I hope to use it to > make better images in the future! > > Thank you! > > Adam > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >