Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]george lottermoser writes in part: > > That brings us back once again to the suggestion that if Leica is to > > have a > > future, that future probably lies in producing lenses in Canon and Nikon > > mounts, or selling Leica lenses with red dotted Canon and Nikon > > adapters, rather than wasting money on trying to produce digital > > backs for a tiny handful of diehard fans. > > B.D. - I have no idea what the future of Leica, Leaf, Imacon, > Sinar, or any other 'high-end' camera/digital/back mfg's may be. > Apparently > they're all shuffling to figure it out. They're tools > that may or may not work for you. They have nothing to do with > 'die-hard' brand loyalty. Your constant background drone of what sounds > like > anti-leica mantras really does little to help our understanding of what is > going on technically - be it optical, digital, mechanical, electronic or > otherwise. > -- Apparently we're supposed to all be greatly impressed by this kind of continuous anti-Leica ranting and raving, which has continued for at least the last 3 years on the list, because the poser posts a PAW. I believe most people are more impressed by what you ARE rather than what you POST. I'm not impressed at all by people who continually shout 'FIRE!' in a crowded theatre. Regards, Greg