Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I try to keep my head above water politics wise, especially in such a horrible situation such as this. But this little stroke of political "bad luck" - or judgement, rather - really, really pisses me off. Protecting the tax payers here at home need be the #1 priority of any political administration. I imagine it's hard to calculate the human lives, and physical capital, cost by this little budgetary trade off, but one can imagine. Scott george lottermoser wrote: >>Baloney - there is no reason they shouldn't be planning for these kind of >>events. I know for sure the British Military plans for massive Disaster >> >> >and > > >>Civil Defence missions such as this - at one time I was involved in just >>such planning. >> >> >------------------------------ >Subject: Bush cuts N.O flood control $$ 44% to pay for Iraq - Salon.com >In 2001, FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the >three most likely disasters in the U.S. But the Bush administration cut New >Orleans flood control funding by 44 percent to pay for the Iraq war. > >By Sidney Blumenthal > > >Aug. 31, 2005 | Biblical in its uncontrolled rage and scope, Hurricane >Katrina has left millions of Americans to scavenge for food and shelter and >hundreds to thousands reportedly dead. With its main levee broken, the >evacuated city of New Orleans has become part of the Gulf of Mexico. But >the >damage wrought by the hurricane may not entirely be the result of an act of >nature. > >A year ago the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed to study how New >Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush >administration ordered that the research not be undertaken. After a flood >killed six people in 1995, Congress created the Southeast Louisiana Urban >Flood Control Project, in which the Corps of Engineers strengthened and >renovated levees and pumping stations. In early 2001, the Federal Emergency >Management Agency issued a report stating that a hurricane striking New >Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S., including a >terrorist attack on New York City. But by 2003 the federal funding for the >flood control project essentially dried up as it was drained into the Iraq >war. In 2004, the Bush administration cut funding requested by the New >Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for holding back the >waters of Lake Pontchartrain by more than 80 percent. Additional cuts at the >beginning of this year (for a total reduction in funding of 44.2 percent >since 2001) forced the New Orleans district of the Corps to impose a hiring >freeze. The Senate had debated adding funds for fixing New Orleans' levees, >but it was too late....... more: > >"No one can say they didn't see it coming": > >http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2005/08/31/disaster_preparation/ind >ex.html > >