Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] sorry forgot to change the subject line: M4 question
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Thu Sep 15 12:44:52 2005
References: <20050915184736.7879.qmail@web81206.mail.yahoo.com> <000601c5ba2b$f3d3c7f0$3201a8c0@AUG01>

Ruben,
It would just work as it's supposed to work. No difference.

If you drop it, things go out of whack a little easier (I have one on
the shelf now with a rangefinder out of whack). I like them,
personally. But I have to admit, it's the Leica I have that has needed
to most service. Granted, it's taken a real beating too.

Daniel

On 9/15/05, Ruben <ruben@rhodos.dk> wrote:
> 
> How would a M4 nr. 1179422 with a Summicron 2/50 mm nr. 2141232 perform
> compared with M3, M2 and M6 - provided that everything works as it should.
> 
> I have never handled a M4 but I recall that there has been some debate on
> issues with this model / or was it the M4p / M4?
> 
> Reason for asking is that I might get an opportunity to get one cheap
> 
> thanks
> 
> Ruben
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from leirex at sbcglobal.net (David Lee) ([Leica] Re: FS: M & R Lenses)
Message from ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben) ([Leica] sorry forgot to change the subject line: M4 question)