Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I met a guy who came my an exhibition yesterday. We got talking. He asked what I used the most and pointed to the pictures. 35 and 50 I said, a 90 here and there. I only _have_ a fifty he said. I had admired his work a couple of months ago. He could afford a Leica and a 50, but no more. At work he uses only digital, so the Leica was just for his private stuff. Believe me, you can do a lot with a 50. I'll dig up his link later. Daniel On 9/17/05, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote: > The last year I shot almost a 100% of my photos with a 35. Sometimes a 90. > Never the 50. My eye just naturally seems to pick the 35. > I went out tonight to take some shots, so I needed my fastest lens. The 35 > is 2.5 (a Color Skopar) and the 90 is 4 (a Rokkor). My 50 is a Summicron so > the logical choice. No, no 'Lux and Co here. > > I had do 2 or 3 steps back for every single photo I had to make. > Lost the shot almast every time, I'm sure. > > Damn that 50 is hard to getting used to again! > And difficult to master, too. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >