Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Third time lucky?
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Mon Oct 3 16:51:56 2005
References: <870D1EA5-FD2A-4E32-8DA3-B0DA319A0FE1@shaw.ca>

John,
It is really nice to see you back on the LUG. You are correct, the 50 ASPH
is a peach of a lens. Third time is a charm and with the nights coming
sooner the 1.4 aperture will come in very handy.
 Don
don.dory@gmail.com

 On 10/3/05, John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> I received my third 50 Asph lens after seven months of waiting since
> I (mea culpa) dropped my second one. This third one is the mort
> consistant mechanically so far.
>
> The first one had a very stiff, notchy feel when going from 0.7m to
> 1.1m. Yes, somewhat strangely, it was only a problem in the one
> direction. It was so bad it was very difficult to focus in the close
> range. That lens went back right away under warranty and, after a
> wait of I think six months, they supplied another new one. This
> second one had only a slight tight spot under exactly the same
> circumstances and I judged it to be acceptable. It was working well
> until I dropped it some feet onto a hard tile floor. Ouch and thank
> goodness for passport!
>
> The third one has a smooth, stiff feel all the way through the
> focusing range with no particular bias as to direction. It is
> slightly difficult to use only one finger on the focusing tab. The
> feel is somewhat akin to the focusing action of the 90/2AA. I was
> happiest with the second one but hopefully this one will loosen up
> with use.
>
> Now finally to shoot more than twenty rolls with the damn thing.
>
> John Collier
>
> PS: Optically it is a peach. My only criticism being that it is a bit
> more flare prone than the Noctilux it replaced.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Third time lucky?)