Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I disagree, the LS-4000 is about 4-5 years old? and the new LS-5000 is not much better... At 12:37 AM 10/8/2005, you wrote: >I think you better run the numbers to see if it's cost effective or not to >buy one right now--they're damn expensive and sure to go down in price and >up in quality. Meanwhile you've saved a ton of $$$$ at the front end. I >did and just couldn't justify buying one now for big bucks, then to find >out next year they're cheaper and much improved--and NOBODY wants last >year's model. > >It's kind like buying the latest and greatest digital camera. The next >model comes out before the ink is dry on the ads for the one you just >bought. It's a real sickening feeling unless you are some kind of pro and >use the hell outa it. > >I remember when we used to bemoan Detroit's planned obsolescence. The >digital boys/ girls have set new records for that program. I for one am no >going to get sucked up in it. > >'Just my opinion. > // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)