Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Which scanner
From: cochranpr at mac.com (David Cochran)
Date: Sat Oct 8 00:52:35 2005
References: <ILENJKCCOJOKJFHFEFACIEGGDIAA.luisripoll@telefonica.net> <43476ADF.8040504@planet.nl> <bdbce3ecb4227b4e5826e6e391b2a5b7@mac.com> <4347769B.8040600@wanadoo.nl>

Thank you all.

I will be scanning 35mm and  MF with some LF on the way.

Flat bed it is ...hanks again


peace

D.
On Oct 8, 2005, at 3:34 AM, Michiel Fokkema wrote:

> David Cochran wrote:
>> Hi to all. I am in the dark when it comes to scanners for negatives 
>> or chrome.
>> Which is better, flatbed or dedicated negative scanners?
>> thanks in advance.
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> Hi David,
>
> If you only scan 35mm a dedicated film scanner is better.
> If you also do mf a flatbed is better because it can do both.
> My Epson 4990 is as good with 35mm as my Minolta dual 3 and has 
> digital ice.
> I really recommend digital ice because it saves time.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michiel Fokkema
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Firsts trials posted on colour)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Firsts trials posted on colour)
Message from cochranpr at mac.com (David Cochran) ([Leica] Which scanner)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Which scanner)