Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Focusing test of Oly E-500 - B. D. PAW
From: dcm at pobox.com (David C. Mason)
Date: Sat Oct 29 13:28:37 2005
References: <4dccee3d0510291113l228797c5jc3b8e866375d202c@mail.gmail.com> <BF894DC1.77B4%bdcolen@comcast.net>

I don't think its better than the 11-22 at all. Everytime I used that
thing I got nothing but soft, soft photos that simply didn't cut it.
It was in no way sharp - not even close. When I sold it I remember
thinking that this was what the old sigma/tokina/etc lenses used to
look like in the 80s - suck, suck, suck.

Perhaps mine was defective, or perhaps I am actually out of my
bleeping mind - but it was B A D.

Oh, I used it on an E300 with updated firmware - hunt, hunt, hunt. Suck.

Dave




On 10/29/05, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote:
> I have found that it definitely hunted on the E-1, but was much better on
> the E-300 and E-500 - the reality being that Olympus has improved the
> autofocus in the body. As to it's not being sharp - yr out of yr bleeping
> mind; that lens is markedly better than the zooms. ;-)
>
>
> On 10/29/05 2:13 PM, "David C. Mason" <dcm@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > Weren't the subway shots done with the 50mm lens? I had that lens for
> > a while and sold it because  it "hunted" far too much in AF and
> > usually lost the hunt. Plus, it wasn't the sharpest of the lot either
> > - not a good lens, especially considering how good that 11-22mm lens
> > is - that thing has to be one of the sharpest I have ever owned...
> > including my Leica lenses.
> >
> > opinions are mine
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/29/05, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> I present these purely as an equipment test, NOT as examples of 
> >> photography
> >> worth comment.:-)
> >> But after all the back and forth about where the E-500 was or wasn't
> >> focusing...
> >> I think I focused on the right-hand eye - my right hand - in both of 
> >> these..
> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/B-D-COLEN-PAW/Qtip1
> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/B-D-COLEN-PAW/Qtip2
> >> Both were shot with the E-500, 11-22 mm zoom at 11 (35 mm equiv is 22 
> >> mm) -
> >> f 2.8, 400 iso. This result suggests to me that any focusing errors in 
> >> those
> >> subway shots were mine, and had to do with train motion, my motion, and
> >> shooting in haste to avoid being punched - :-) - and had nothing to do 
> >> with
> >> the camera.
> >>
> >> And, yes, her name is Qtip - she's all white with a smudge on the top 
> >> of her
> >> head. I kept trying to force every one to call her Mona, because she was
> >> doing that constantly until she was, uh, altered. But needless to say, I
> >> lost out on that one. :-)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Focusing test of Oly E-500 - B. D. PAW)
In reply to: Message from dcm at pobox.com (David C. Mason) ([Leica] Focusing test of Oly E-500 - B. D. PAW)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Focusing test of Oly E-500 - B. D. PAW)