Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT
From: mcyclwritr at comcast.net (mcyclwritr@comcast.net)
Date: Wed Jan 4 10:02:44 2006

Not to klck the Gray Lady while she's down, but I heard that today's NYT 
front page trumpeted 12 survivors from the West Virginia mine tragedy. Can 
you say "scoop hungry?" "Unsubstantiated?" "Reckless?"

Who was the reporter on the scene who phoned in the report? Who was the 
front page editor who didn't ask, "Are the survivors out of the mine? Have 
you seen them? Have you talked with any of them? Have you spoken directly 
with rescuers or mine officials to confirm they're alive? Do you have names? 
Do we have pix?" 

Basic reporting. Cool your jets and get it right. Better to be correct in 
the late edition than early and wrong. Of course, the NYT wasn't alone in 
its premature emotulation. Other eastern papers jumped onboard and got it 
wrong, too. Basic reporting, boys and girls. Basic.

-Chris Lawson  







 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@comcast.net>
> I love this...Both of those papers publish 365 days a year, and each day
> provide how many 10s of thousands of words. The Post had a scandal in, 
> what,
> 1980? And the Times has been snookered a couple times, and we're talking
> about their "style of reportage?" Get real here - their style of reportage
> is to provide astoundingly good news coverage day in and day out - and once
> and a while psychos - in the case of the Post and Ms. Cooke and the Times
> and Jason Blair - or a self-aggrandizing careerist with a political agenda,
> make it through the screening process. Big whoop. ;-)
> 
> 
> On 1/4/06 11:34 AM, "Allen Graves" <p_intern@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> 
> > And don't forget the Washington Post.
> > 
> > Allen
> > 
> > jon.stanton@comcast.net wrote:
> >> Hasn't this been the NYT style of repotage for years??
> >> 
> >> 
> >>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> >> From: Thinkofcole@aol.com
> >> 
> >>> Here's what may have happened:
> >>> 
> >>> On Dec. 29, a photography site in Spain called Caborian.com ran what it
> >>> called an April's Fools item in Spanish {see its dec. 29 posting}  
> >>> saying
> >>> that 
> >>> in 
> >>> Spain the equivalent of April fools is celebrated on Dec. 28 and that  
> >>> "on
> >>> Caborian we wanted to maintain the tradition, publishing false news of 
> >>> the
> >>> merger of Canon and Leica." Here is the Dec. 29 posting...[it does not
> >>> mention  
> >>> Asahi Shimbun].
> >>>      
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)
Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)
Reply from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)
Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)