Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Quality/size ratio and digital - Re: [Leica] re: digital treadmill
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Sun Jan 15 19:32:24 2006
References: <BFEF0FDC.ADB4%bdcolen@comcast.net> <BC6F99CC-198E-4CD2-A685-C35308DDCC3D@openhealth.org>

When will camera manufacturers finally begin to address this quality/size
ratio issue with digital cameras? In addition to Leica's, in fairly 
recent years,
film technology  gave us oodles of nice, very, very high quality film P&S
cameras from many manufacturers- you know, Contax T3's, Leica CM's
and the like (pic your favorite).

Yet we still don't have pocketable digicams (AF or RF ) with big APS or
larger sensors and world class, reasonably fast fixed focal length optics.
Heck, my first "real camera" Canonet I received as a 12 year old  had a
f1.7 lens or so, IIRC.

Yeah, a  very high quality small digital camera will not be a "Best Buy" 
kind
of mass market camera, but then neither were the very high quality small
film cameras.  But if there was a market for the quality small film 
cameras,
why not with digital?

Scott

Jonathan Borden wrote:

>  
> What keeps me with the M6 (at least for the next year) is a couple of  
> factors:
>
> 1) the quality/size ratio -- you can compare an M6/film image against  
> a DSLR but compact digital cameras don't really approach the image  
> quality of an M6 and film.
>


Replies: Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) (Quality/size ratio and digital - Re: [Leica] re: digital treadmill)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] re: digital treadmill)
Message from jonathan at openhealth.org (Jonathan Borden) ([Leica] re: digital treadmill)