Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D. >>....one of the reasons that I've gone with digital, is that digital tends to capture more information in low light than does film.<< You're going to have to explain that one to me. I always though that the amount of information in low light -- or "shadow detail" for those of us in the Pleistocene Era -- depended on exposure? As far as I know negative film still beats a DSLR in dynamic range. DaveR