Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Some final thoughts on the recent discussion of the uxe of magnesium plating on the ZI . . . Claims were that magnesium is corrosive, which is true. Recent development of magnesium alloys have largely eliminated this problem. Some still don't like magnesium. Okay. Let's turn the question around. What about brass? Corrosive? Well, it's certainly not water proof. Brass is also an alloy - copper & zinc. Copper is highly corrosive. It will rust with exposure to even small amounts of water within a week. Zinc is also corrosive unless it is electroplated. What metal is closest to zinc in chemical composition? Magnesium. With proper electroplating, magnesium will be about as resistant to corrosion as zinc. Bottom line is whether these materials will fare well in their intended applications, not in an abstract discussion of metallurgy. For its application as external cladding on a camera body, magnesium like brass (copper & zinc) will do just fine - unless someone tries to use it as an underwater camera. Leica agrees with this point, as evidenced by their use of magnesium on the Digilux & their description of it as "robust & long-lived." Bill