Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi JB Thanks for your take and advice - much appreciated Brgds / Joseph Low -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of John Black Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 4:10 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Olympus Pen F In reviving an old standard - may I ask for feedbacks from fellow Luggers on the Olympus Pen F JosephLow / Singapore Joseph: I haven't used my Pen-F system for a while but really enjoyed it as a well crafted and inovatively designed little machine. The pluses are it's size and reliability. As mentioned, it syncs at all speeds and the viewing system is a true SLR. The down sides are a relatively dark viewer which is based on the poroprism concept using mirrors instead of a prism and a rather coarse GG screen. The FT is especially dark as part of the light is diverted from the finder by means of a partially reflective surface to an internal light meter. I have all 3 bodies, the Penn-F (earliest with a double stroke advance), the Pen-FT (greatest numbers, with internal meter) and the bugit minded Pen-FV which is a meterless FT (better finder). Karen is right, the advance lever is weak, stamped sheet aluminum that feels flimsey and bends easily. The internal gearing is rough also, grinding heavily on advancement. That said, it handles like a rangefinder, having essentially no prism hump. I must disagree on the lenses though. I have found them to be very ordinary with only the 38/3.5 Macro being really outstanding. I usually use a dedicated adaptor and the somewhat better OM lenses. Great to get 70-80 shots per roll. JB _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information