Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Back to Pictures
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Fri Jan 27 05:21:14 2006
References: <200601210315.k0L3F41c036687@server1.waverley.reid.org> <E4E53CFB-B933-4442-B0BB-B75490464272@pandora.be> <a2f8f4470601210324v2781f50bydf6d50b160d32d2c@mail.gmail.com> <7839020F-2958-4A71-9DAB-1C45564BE41F@mac.com>

Sorry if I'm late.

Yes, Ken, I use slightly different for 120. It's close:

130%
0.6 (or 0.8) pixels
0 threshold

Daniel

On 1/21/06, Kenneth Frazier <kennybod@mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>
> > For 35mm I use an unsharp mask of 130%, 0,3 pixels and 0 threshold.
> > Not sure why. It give just enough sharpening that you can see som
>
> Do you use a different setting for your 120 work?
>
> Ken
>
> -----------------------------------
> The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
> Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
> Current Leica Photography (PAW):
> http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r
>
> Current Medium Format Photos:
> http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Back to Pictures)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Back to Pictures)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Back to Pictures)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Back to Pictures)