Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] DMR mk II ?
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Sun Feb 5 10:06:57 2006
References: <212-SnapperMsg4EA12C31C00AFD3D@[70.194.234.15]> <43D6032A000649C3@mssbzhh-int.msg.bluewin.ch> <6.2.3.4.2.20060205113716.01d54720@mail.rhtc.net>
Tina wrote:
> Peter - You'd better look again at the history of Leica. It started out
> as a camera prized by photojournalists for its durability, handling, size,
> and ability to shoot in low light.
Tina, I do not mean to nit-pick. I believe that Leica started out as a
camera prized by [a relative handful of] photojournalists and sold
overwhelmingly to what were then called advanced amateurs.
Seth
Seth
Replies:
Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
In reply to:
Message from bd_colen at harvard.edu (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
Message from pwerner at bluewin.ch (pwerner@bluewin.ch) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)